Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1787

reference
793-tree-1
name
1787
tree-preservation-order

undefined

793-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.013419 50.864477)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.013306 50.864465,-1.013311 50.864487,-1.013327 50.864507,-1.013352 50.864523,-1.013383 50.864534,-1.013418 50.864537,-1.013453 50.864534,-1.013485 50.864524,-1.013511 50.864509,-1.013527 50.864489,-1.013533 50.864466,-1.013528 50.864444,-1.013512 50.864424,-1.013488 50.864408,-1.013456 50.864397,-1.013421 50.864394,-1.013386 50.864397,-1.013354 50.864407,-1.013329 50.864422,-1.013312 50.864442,-1.013306 50.864465)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL